Human Capital and Napoleon Dynamite

In regions calcium Rex est luscious, [In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king]. This well-known quote by the Dutch writer, truth seeker, and student, Desiderius Erasmus, is probably interpreted by using an economist in this manner: In the land of the negative, (or rich for that count number), the productive man is king. In other words, he who has the maximum human capital; (talents, talents, perseverance, honesty, creativity, education, and many others.), will lead an extra comfortable lifestyle. In the e-book, Naked Economics, Charles Wheelan dedicates a bankruptcy to discuss how human capital performs a key position in know-how why certain humans are negative and what may be completed approximately it.

A critical concept offered at the beginning of this bankruptcy is that the hard work market is not any one of a kind from the market for anything else. In a hard work market, an ability worker is making an attempt to “promote” his or her competencies and abilities to an employer.

Napoleon Dynamite: Well, no person’s going to go out with me!

Pedro: Have you asked anybody but?

Napoleon Dynamite: No, but who could? I do not even have any right abilities.

Pedro: What do you mean?

Napoleon Dynamite: You recognize, like nunchuck abilities, bow hunting competencies, PC hacking talents… Girls most effective need boyfriends who’ve wonderful competencies.

Pedro: Aren’t you quite properly at drawing, like animals and warriors and stuff?

Napoleon Dynamite: Yes… In all likelihood the first-rate that I recognize of.

napoleon.jpg (1594×864)

Here we see that Napoleon recognizes the significance of true talents when seeking to attract a member of the alternative sex. Just as an employee with none skills would now not expect to be hired, Napoleon is positive an ability date could turn him away. But Napoleon’s probabilities of touchdown a date rise as he realizes he’s the fine artist of all of the people he is aware of, (a completely unique ability a worker can marketplace to set himself other than other applicants). Employees (or singles) with a greater set of abilities or an extra precise set of abilities may be in extra demand. By applying the primary economic principle of delivering and call for we are able to infer that as the call for positive talents goes up, so does the value of hiring an employee (or dating someone) with the one’s skills. The contrary holds true as properly, the less “human capital” an employee offers, the decrease the salary he gets. This brings us to our first point: Poverty is due to a lack of talents, or human capital.


The wealthy are becoming richer due to the fact they may be becoming an increasing number of productive, and the poor, properly, they are not doing something one of a kind. “Productivity is the performance with which we convert inputs into outputs,” and “human capital is inextricably linked — to productiveness,” (pg 107). To be greater productivity, one should broaden extra human capital. We observe “The poverty charge for high school dropouts in America is twelve instances the poverty charge for university graduates,” (pg a hundred and one). An easy solution with complex implications is then advised; better training for these disadvantaged men and women. The complex implications arise in trying to plot a policy that could enable the bad class to grow to be more productive for the reason that “Disadvantaged mother and father beget deprived kids,” (pg 106). These parents do now not make investments in the human capital of their kids and for this reason, make it tough for the exertions market to provide work for these individuals.

“Our general inventory of human capital the entirety we know as a people defines how nicely off we are as a society,” (pg one hundred and five). Although we haven’t removed poverty altogether, if we had been to evaluate our whole country, from bad class to upper-magnificence, we’re doing extraordinarily nicely at advancing our ordinary human capital, so much that the poverty line is now at a level of real earnings that changed into attained most effective by means of those within the Pinnacle 10 percent of the income distribution a century in the past. It may be real that inside the land of the blind the one-eyed man is king, but we live in a country wherein all of us have the ability to look; some just pick to preserve their eyes closed.