Rupert Tarsey became poised to make a clean beginning in South Florida when his past caught up with him. Now, he is lashing at a blogger who helped derail his strive at a phoenix-like upward thrust. You may bear in mind the tale. After he took a position on the Broward Republican executive committee closing year, reporters throughout the nation stuck wind that Tarsey, at age 17, had used a hammer to strike a woman classmate at the same time as attending the distinguished private high college Harvard-Westlake in Los Angeles. He secured a plea deal on a charge of assault with a deadly weapon in 2010 and had his sentence suspended within the California court docket.



  • Millennial Lauren Cooley Wants to Lead Broward’s Republicans
  • Rick Scott Aide Shuts Down RedBroward, Blogger Claims UPDATED
  • South Florida Bloggers Pick Their Favorite Posts of 2012, Part Two

The Daily Mail, Sunshine State News, the Los Angeles Times, and the Sun-Sentinel chronicled how he had averted jail time and resettled in South Florida. Reporters mentioned that Tarsey’s beyond had not been fully disclosed when he was voted into the Republican committee ranks in 2017. One neighborhood blogger, Tom Lauder, incensed Tarsey to no stop. Lauder is a Broward politics buff whose relationships with Republican leadership have ranged from pleasant to contentious. His weblog RedBroward, which has been cited in multiple South Florida media stores and a Politico brief over time, discusses the Tarsey trouble in element.

Tarsey’s recently filed lawsuit alleges Lauder crossed a line by sending an electronic mail calling him a “piece of shit murderer” and telling him he turned into “going to hell.” Lauder also allegedly bombarded Tarsey with unwelcome textual content messages that caused him to go through intense “emotional misery.” The authenticity of that inflammatory email is a matter of discussion. Lauder declined to comment on the case’s specifics and instructed New Times he’s nonetheless formulating a prison approach with his legal professional.

Tarsey, for his element, claims Lauder is not a reporter and obtained his “media credentials from Candyland.” He claims Lauder posted at least six articles on RedBroward “that comprise a couple of instances of fake and defamatory statements.” Among different grievances, Tarsey says that descriptions of the hammer attack on RedBroward are misguided and that he’s repeatedly misquoted on the weblog. He also takes trouble with Lauder’s posting a letter despatched through a former Broward Republican chair to local party members. Tarsey is said to have intimidated and threatened his critics.

The defamation claims’ achievement should hinge on whether the court docket deems Tarsey to be a public figure. If he is located in that class, his burden of proving defamation is higher. He would likely have to reveal real malice, which means the writer intentionally neglected the truth or had reckless indifference toward it. That widespread became installed in the landmark case New York Times v. Sullivan.

The lawsuit in opposition to Lauder additionally faces felony hurdles in overcoming internet site immunity underneath the Communications Decency Act, which can guard website online operators against liability for statements made via 0.33 parties in a website’s remark segment. Several allegedly defamatory comments cited inside the Healthy seem to be pulled from RedBroward’s consumer remarks. One such information refers to Tarsey as a “thug.”


Tarsey, whose family owns a multimillion-greenback real-estate empire, has talked about no longer holding public office even though he is running for politics. His expert profile describes him as an assets investor, inventory dealer, and grassroots Republican campaigner. “I, in my view, knocked on at the least 10,000 doorways and made heaps of phone calls, speakme with people, and registered severa voters,” Tarsey says in the profile, touting his efforts at some stage in Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential marketing campaign. The profile indicates him ziplining and spending time with family at the park. He’s depicted as a philanthropist: “Giving back to my community makes me feel like I serve my motive and set a good instance for my kids. But extra importantly, it’s a Christian element to do.”


As for the vintage crook fees, Tarsey claims his past became dug up by political warring parties in 2017 in retaliation for supporting the ouster of then-Republican government committee chairman Bob Sutton. Tarsey and his lawyers for years have attempted to downplay the attack sufferer’s accidents. During the plea listening in 2010, the victim’s father, Dr. David Barcay, shut down the protection legal professionals’ assertion that his daughter had swiftly recovered from the attack. He said his daughter was in “inconsistent pain every day... Her shattered leg has a rod from her knee to her ankle… She walks with a limp.”

Dr. Barcay said that on a journey to a neighborhood Jamba Juice, Tarsey drove his daughter to a cul-de-sac close to their excessive college, trapped her in a car, and beat her relentlessly with a hammer in an unprovoked assault. He said his daughter “will by no means be able to break out from the horrors of those moments.” The account assesses Tarsey’s claims that he administered the hammer blows in self-defense after a verbal altercation between the two teens escalated into violence. Court records show the circle of relatives ultimately customary restitution and consented to the plea deal, which entailed no jail time for Tarsey. The legal fee to which Tarsey pleaded no contest was later reduced to a misdemeanor.